Legal Opinion
State v. Hancock
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 22, 1992No. 900714; CA A65081PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals her conviction for delivery of marijuana for consideration. ORS 475.992(2)(a). She makes numerous assignments of error. We address only her claims that the trial court erred in overruling her objection to the admission of a report prepared by the Oregon State Police Crime Detection Laboratory (laboratory) and that the trial court erred by failing to give her requested instructions on accomplice testimony. We affirm.
On December 19, 1989, Smith was employed by the Lincoln City Police Department as an undercover agent. Early that evening, he went to a local bar to purchase…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HancockOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BaumgartnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WilliamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. BogartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.