Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bryner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge.

“Go to hell, Betsy”, when shouted in a public place, is the type of speech that most people would consider annoying, some provocative, and some downright frightening. But, is it “obscene” within the meaning of our statute proscribing disorderly conduct? That is the sole question presented by this appeal.

The facts may be summarized as follows: On September 3, 1993, Appellant was charged with the summary offense of disorderly conduct 1 as the result of refusing to exit Long’s Auction Barn following a request to leave. The record reveals that Appellant, while standing near a table…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Hess v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Clifton v. Borough of EddystoneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Brockway v. ShepherdDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. PennixSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API