Legal Opinion

Gemco Latinoamerica, Inc. v. Seiko Time Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 14, 1987No. 86 Civ. 6329 (WK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.

Plaintiff Gemco Latinoamérica (“Gem-co”), which served from 1974 to 1986 as the exclusive distributor in Puerto Rico of Seiko brand watches and clocks imported by defendant Seiko Time Corporation (“Seiko Time”), alleges that Seiko Time and its corporate parent Hattori Corporation of America (“Hattori-U.S.”), and grandparent, Hattori Seiko Company (“Hattori-Ja-pan”) engaged in unfair competition and violated antitrust laws as well as Puerto Rico’s Law 75 (“Law 75”), 10 L.P.R.A. § 278 et seq., which protects distributors from wrongful termination…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Gemco Latinoamerica, Inc. v. Seiko Time Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Acquaire v. Canada Dry BottlingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. Hough v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Ketchum v. Almahurst Bloodstock IVDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API