Legal Opinion

City of Bridge City v. State Ex Rel. City of Port Arthur

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 18, 1990No. 09-89-053 CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a bench trial held in the 163rd District Court in and for Orange County. Visiting Judge, Arthur C. Lesher, Jr. of Houston was appointed to try this case. After a trial on the merits, a judgment adverse to the defendant, City of Bridge City, appellant herein, was entered on January 27, 1989 along with findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found that the Bridge City Ordinances IX-42 and IX-43 were void ab initio and awarded attorney’s fees to the City of Port Arthur in the amount of $86,089.85 with certain remittiturs to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. SprayTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Flint & Associates v. Intercontinental Pipe & Steel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merchandise Center, Inc. v. WNS, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  2. Safeway Managing General Agency for State & County Mutual Fire Insurance v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  3. Village of Creedmoor v. Frost National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Hunt v. City of LongviewDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
  5. Mapco, Inc. v. Carter, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API