Legal Opinion
Mapco, Inc. v. Carter
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided April 25, 1991No. 09-88-198 CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
OPINION ON REMAND
Appeal from a judgment ordering partition and making an award of owelty in the partition of a fee mineral estate.
Partial Background History
Clarence Carter, James Ross Carter and Clyde Carter brought a cause of action against Mapco Underground Storage of Texas, Inc. (“M.U.S.T.”) and Texasgulf, a private corporation, for the equitable proceeding of partitioning of the fee mineral estate owned and possessed, in undivided interests, by the litigants. The Plaintiffs’ pleadings contained a count for waste caused by a leaching operation. M.U.S.T. and Mapco, Inc.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Brown v. Frontier Theatres, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Dallas v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mapco, Inc. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Parvin v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Harris County Appraisal District v. Coastal Liquids Transportation, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Mapco, Inc. v. Carter, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991
- Myers-Woodward, LLC v. Underground Services Markham, LLC and United Brine Pipeline Company LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.