Legal Opinion

Paschall v. Christie-Stewart, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1974No. 72-922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we noted probable jurisdiction, 411 U. S. 915 (1973), in order to consider whether the published notice provisions of the then-applicable Oklahoma tax-sale statutes, Okla. Stat., Tit. 68, §§ 382 and 432b (1951), comported with due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.1 See Mullane v. Central Han*101over Bank & Trust Co., 339 U. S. 306 (1950). This was the only issue addressed by the appellate courts of Oklahoma 2 and by the parties in the Jurisdictional Statement and the papers responsive thereto filed with this Court.

After oral argument and upon our review of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Walker v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Christie-Stewart, Inc. v. PaschallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Grant County v. GuyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. QUAY DEV. v. Elegante Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Guaranty Mortgage Corp. v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. Alma Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API