Legal Opinion
Christie-Stewart, Inc. v. Paschall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 26, 1972No. 43907PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
The question for decision is whether the Oklahoma statutory procedure for the sale of real property for delinquent ad valorem taxes complies with constitutionally adequate notice and due process of law. A brief statement of the facts will explain how the issue arose.
Prior to 1952 the Paschalls and H. Grady Ross acquired by mineral deeds 1%eths of the minerals in and under a 40 acre tract of land in Seminole County, Oklahoma. The surface owner failed to pay the ad valorem taxes for the year 1952, and pursuant to statute the County Treasurer included the land in the Original…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Paschall v. Christie-Stewart, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grant County v. GuyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- QUAY DEV. v. Elegante Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Guaranty Mortgage Corp. v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.