Legal Opinion

Millard v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 18, 1987No. 244-87CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge.

This case involves a pro se claim by Arthur Frank Millard under the Tucker Act, as amended, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 and the U.S. Constitution for damages in the amount of $5,000 resulting from the “wrongful taking” of military pay and allowances, declaratory and injunctive relief against defendant, costs of suit, leave to apply for attorneys’ fees and expenses and other and further relief. The case is before the Court for disposition on the defendant’s Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss. The Court grants the motion to dismiss for the reasons which follow.

*57 Background

The defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buffalo National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  2. United Sales, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Markey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Ward v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API