Legal Opinion

Sellers & Co. v. Malone-Pilcher Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from- Houston. Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce. Action by N. L. Sellers & Co. - against tbe MalonePilcber Co., in trespass, trover and case. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals. Tbe duty to make a tender may be waived. — 21 Ala. 782; 99 Ala. 90. Plaintiff bad tbe riglit to tender tbe money and then sue.— Frank, v. Pickens, 69 Ala. 369. Counsel discuss a motion to strike the bill of exceptions and cite authorities.

Read the full summary

Appeal from- Houston. Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce. Action by N. L. Sellers & Co. - against tbe MalonePilcber Co., in trespass, trover and case. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals. Tbe duty to make a tender may be waived. — 21 Ala. 782; 99 Ala. 90. Plaintiff bad tbe riglit to tender tbe money and then sue.— Frank, v. Pickens, 69 Ala. 369. Counsel discuss a motion to strike the bill of exceptions and cite authorities. Tbe condition coupled with the tender destroyed its efficacy. — Wilhite v. Ryan, 66 Ala. 106; Commercial F. Ins. Co. r. Allen, 80 Ala. 670; Oclam v.…

1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.

In the original complaint there were two counts, one in trespass and the other in trover; the first, alleging that the defendant, Malone-Pilclier Company, wrongfully took, and the other that it converted, a. mule, the property of plaintiffs. The complaint was amended by adding a count — the third — in case, for destroying plaintiffs’ right to or lien on said mule, and the case ivas tried on this count.

The trial was had on the plea of the general issue; and the court, at the request of defendant, gave the general charge in its favor.

The case is here for review on this charge, and on errors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Frank v. PickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Maxwell v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Wilhite v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Hamaker v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Decker v. State Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Maples v. MorringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. J. E. Pinkham Lumber Co. v. C. W. Griffin Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API