Decker v. State Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.
The case went to the jury on counts three and four of the complaint. Count three is in detinue to recover one super-streamline 9-foot Walrus Soda Fountain. County four claims thirty-five hundred dollars as damages for the alleged conversion of the same described personal property. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. Motion for a new trial was denied, and the plaintiff in the court below prosecutes this appeal.
The record shows that on October 6, 1947, Luther E. Parker, Jr., executed a note and chattel mortgage on the soda fountain to the Citizens…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stuart v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Hampton v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Maxwell v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Smith v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Butler Cotton Oil Co. v. G. H. Campbell & SonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Ridout's-Brown Service, Inc. v. HollowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Mangina v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Willingham v. LankfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Skelton v. J&G, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.