Frank v. Pickens
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Conecuh Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. Joi-in'P. Hubbard. The facts are stated in the opinion. (No briefs came to the hands of the reporter.)
1Opinion of the CourtBriokell, C. J.
This is an action by a mortgagor against the assignee of the mortgage for the recovery in specie •of chattels. After the law day of the mortgage had passed, and there was continuous default in the payment of the mortgage debt, the assignee, with a view to foreclosure by the exercise of the power of sale contained in the mortgage, took possession of the chattels, and was proceeding to exercise the power. The mortgagor caused or procured a tender to be made to the assignee of the sum of sixty dollars, which he claimed was sufficient to pay the mortgage debt, and all legal or equitable charges.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Welsh v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Morrow v. Turney's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Slaughter v. Doe ex dem. Swift, Murphy & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Brown v. LipscombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839
- Sims v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Parker v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Shelby v. TardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Moore v. O'DellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Fields v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Maxwell v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.