Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1997No. A073787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, Acting P. J.

I. Introduction

John Creighton et al., appeal from a judgment in favor of the Board of Regents of the University of California in a class action challenging the university’s voluntary early retirement incentive program on contract clause and equal protection grounds. We affirm.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

The University of California manages three national laboratories under contracts with the United States Department of Energy (DOE). Laboratory employees are covered by the University of California Retirement Plan (UCRP), a “defined benefit” plan funded by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Delgado v. Heritage Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Bunnett v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Mendoza v. Town of RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Blue v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Sacramento County Retired Employees Ass'n v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  5. Cal Fire Local 2881 v. Cal. Pub. Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API