Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1976No. 75-887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Although some authority exists to support appellant’s proposition that a municipal police officer lacks authority outside of the municipality which he serves to make a warrantless arrest for the commission *221of a misdemeanor,1 this court has had no occasion to decide that question.

The question will remain open however because appellant has not presented it in a posture susceptible to adjudication.

Appellant’s motion for dismissal was overruled by the court upon a holding2 that officer Barnickel’s attempted arrest of Hubbard was lawful. The Court of Appeals agreed that “the arrest of Hubbard in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Fairborn v. MunkusOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. ElderZanesville Municipal Court · 1951
  3. State v. VanbargToledo Municipal Court · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Cincinnati v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CLRCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. State v. Foster, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1979
  5. State v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API