Legal Opinion

United States v. Hayes

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 8, 1965No. Crim. No. 12987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and Order.

HANNAY, District Judge.

This is a Petition under Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A., to set aside a federal conviction on the alleged grounds that Petitioner was not represented by counsel whom he hired, that he did not waive representation by his allegedly hired counsel, and that he did not accept the counsel whom the trial court appointed to represent him.

The arraignment and trial of Petitioner were before Honorable Joe In-graham, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas. With the filing of Petitioner’s affidavit of prejudice, the cause was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1979
  2. Hayes v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  3. Russell L. Hayes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API