Hayes v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT
COWAN, District Judge.
I. The Issue and Coram Nobis Generally The principal issue in this coram nobis proceeding is whether the plaintiff, Russell Lee Hayes, at the time of his trial in February, 1957, was mentally competent to stand trial. The United States’ counterclaim raises the issue of whether Mr. Hayes has abused the writ. The undersigned, on the basis of a full factual record, has determined that Hayes was fully competent and that he has grossly abused the writ.
Coram nobis is available as a remedy for setting aside a constitutionally infirm…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Norman Silverstein v. Robert HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Roland Leon HugueninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Stokes v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
- Kramer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984