Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ionia. Trespass. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

Rich sued Smith in an action of trespass. The real controversy between them concerns the location of the quarter section post between sections twenty-sir and thirty-five in township eight north of range eight west: Smith owning land on section thirty-five and Rich land on section twenty-sir which would be separated by the line running from this quarter post to the corner of sections 26, 27, 34 and 35.

There seems to have been no controversy regarding the actual location of the section corners by the government surveyor, and Smith claimed that the quarter post between sections 26 and 35 was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pugh v. SchindlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Beeman v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Van Der Groef v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API