Legal Opinion

Beeman v. Black

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Berrien. Trespass. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against ■defendant for taking and carrying away 25 cords of wood. .Tlie controversy all turned on.the boundary of the land where it was cut. Plaintiff had been owner and possessor of a government subdivision of land on the north side of which was an old line with monuments and blazed trees, which had been there for many years. Some time in the year before this wood was cut a new line had been run by a person who is said to have been county surveyor, who disregarded the old land-marks and cut off from plaintiff’s former ostensible bounds a gore of wood two rods…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arneson v. SpawnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Sherrin v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Pugh v. SchindlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API