Legal Opinion

Baker v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1966No. Civ. 29833PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

The petitioner seeks a review and an annulment of a supplemental award of workmen’s compensation benefits made to him wherein the Industrial Accident Commission rated his permanent disability, after apportionment, at 55 percent of total permanent disability.

The question presented is whether the finding that “the injury caused permanent disability of 55%, after apportionment . . .’’is supported by substantial evidence.

The petitioner filed an application for workmen’s compensation benefits wherein he named 23 employers for whom he had worked during the period of time from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rogers Materials Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Fred Gledhill Chevrolet v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Pullman Kellogg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Hulbert v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API