Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Markey & Hancock
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 26, 2020No. 5ag/19PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. James Andrew Markey and Charles Leonard Hancock, Misc. Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2019 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION – Court of Appeals indefinitely suspended from practice of law in Maryland two lawyers who, for approximately seven years, while working for federal government, participated in exchange of e-mails among group of employees, who were also lawyers, using official government e-mail addresses during work hours to make disturbingly inappropriate and offensive statements that demonstrated bias or prejudice based upon race,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lewis Hodge, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Linda Green v. Franklin National Bank of Minneapolis, Doing Business as Franklin BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- George Clark v. Champion National Sec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Deloach v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. VasiliadesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.