Legal Opinion
F & D Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Powder Coaters, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 22, 2002No. 25498PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
This Court granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in F & D Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Powder Coaters, Inc., 342 S.C. 443, 537 S.E.2d 285 (Ct.App.2000). The Court of Appeals held the materialman was not entitled to a mechanic’s lien since the owner of the property did not give proper consent, as is required by the Mechanic’s Lien Statute, S.C.Code Ann. § 29-5-10 et. seq. (1991). We affirm, as modified.
Factual/ Procedural Background
BG Holding f/k/a Colite Industries, Inc. (“BG Holding”) is a one-third owner of about thirty acres of real estate in West Columbia, South…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Swinton Creek Nursery v. Edisto Farm CreditSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Brown v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Trico Surveying, Inc. v. Godley Auction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- St. Catherine's Church Corp. v. Technical Planning Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- NUNLEY CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. v. Four Taylors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hurd v. Williamsburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- 5 Star, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Hurd v. Williamsburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003