Legal Opinion
Hurd v. Williamsburg County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 28, 2005No. 25959Published
1Opinion of the Court
363 S.C. 421 (2005)
611 S.E.2d 488
Jack HURD, Respondent,
v.
WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY and Williamsburg County Transit Authority, Petitioners.
No. 25959.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard January 4, 2005.
Decided March 28, 2005.
Charles E. Carpenter, Jr. and S. Elizabeth Brosnan, of Richardson, Plowden, Carpenter & Robinson, P.A., of Columbia, and Stephen Paul Bucher, of Bucher Firm, P.C., of North Charleston, for Petitioners.
Ladson Fishburne Howell, Jr., of Howell and Christmas, L.L.C., and Richard G. Wern, of The Wern Law Firm, P.A., both of North Charleston, and Ronnie Alan Sabb, of Law Offices of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bloom v. RavoiraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.