Legal Opinion
Pace v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 5, 2010No. 09-16079PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Chief Judge:
Appellants, Madglean Pace, Marvin Pace, Charles Pace, Melvin Pace, and Shelley Pace, Jr., (“the Pace family”), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of CSX Transportation (“CSX”) on their state law nuisance claim stemming from CSX’s construction and use of a side track adjacent to property owned by the Pace family in Ambrose, Georgia. The Pace family argues that the district court erred in finding that their claim is preempted by section 10501(b)(2) of the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995, 49 U.S.C. § 10101-11908 (2006).
Af…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Laura Skop v. City of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Connecticut State Dental Ass'n v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Cliff v. Payco General American Credits, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Elam v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Keith Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia, (FARC)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Bonny Edward Taylor v. Henry P. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Henry C. Wedemeyer v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Strasburg Scooters, LLC v. Strasburg Rail Rd., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.