Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoffenberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1995No. 94 Cr. 0273 (RWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendant Steven Hoffenberg (“Hof-fenberg”) has moved under the unusual circumstances described below to enforce the Cooperational Plea Agreement of September 23, 1993 (the “Agreement”) between Hoffen-berg and the United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York and the Northern District of Illinois (the “Government”).
Upon the hearing on contested facts, the prior proceedings and the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is denied.
The Issues
This proceeding sets the framework for the' final resolution of the responsibility of Hoffenberg for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-MarquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Domingo RexachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Mohammad Wazir KhanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoffenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. BullaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. HoffenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. FloresDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hoffenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.