Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoffenberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 1996No. 94 Cr. 0273 (RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Steven Hoffenberg (“Hoffenberg”) has moved to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that the allocution failed to meet the standards of Rule 11, Fed.R.Crim.P. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.
Prior Proceedings
The parties, prior proceedings and facts of this action are fully set forth in several prior Opinions of the Court, familiarity with which is assumed. See United States v. Hoffenberg, 859 F.Supp. 698 (S.D.N.Y.1994); United States v. Hoffenberg, 1995 WL 10840 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 1994); United States v. Hoffenberg, 908 F.Supp. 1265…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jose Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Victoria VamosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Michael JournetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoffenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Hoffenberg v. Hoffman & PollokDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Hoffenberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006