Legal Opinion

People v. Trimble

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1936No. Crim. 2914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment containing a finding by the trial court that defendant had previously been convicted of a felony after defendant’s plea of guilty of violation of section 503 of the Vehicle Code.

The facts so far as material are these:

Prior to defendant’s plea of guilty to violation of section 503 of the Vehicle Code, he had been convicted of violation of section 146 of the California Vehicle Act, for which offense he was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,095.

This is the sole question presented for our determination:

Does the imposition of a penalty other than…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. In Re MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. People v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. In Re BorahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. In Re GohlkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. BattinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API