Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1929No. A-5824PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of grand larceny, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, and overruled. The defendant excepted, and the case appealed to this court.

The testimony introduced on behalf of the state in substance is that on the 1st day of November, 1924, there was taken from the possession of J. D. Nickles, Tom Boyd-ston, and Ciscero Sewell three bales of cotton of the value of $300, the said cotton being in the ginyard of a gin near Matoy, Oklahoma; that on the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bohannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Wertzberger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Tomlinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Gransbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Rousek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API