Legal Opinion

United States v. Tynan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 27, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KHOX, District Judge.

An indictment has been filed in this court wherein it is charged that upon June 17, 1922, within the Southern district of New York, the defendant' William Tynan unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly, for the purpose of defrauding the United States, and with the intent to utter as true, possessed certain falsely made, forged, and counterfeited writings purporting to be prescriptions issued by various physicians, whose names were written thereon, for intoxicating liquors, under the provisions of the Volstead Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.), and its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. BarnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
  4. Hamburg-American Steam Packet Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Butzman v. United States. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Goldsmith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. United States v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. United States Ex Rel. Starr v. MulliganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Head v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API