Legal Opinion

United States v. Goldsmith

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 18, 1933No. 231PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is prosecuted by the appellant in forma pauperis. He was convicted upon two indictments which were consolidated for trial. The first indictment contained two counts charging impersonation of a federal employee (18 USCA § 76) and two counts charging the uttering of a forged writing (18 USCA § 72); the second indictment, drawn under the same statute, contained one count for. impersonation of a federal employee and one count for uttering a forged writing. Upon each of the four counts of the first indietment the appellant was sentenced to imprisonment in the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sparks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  2. Butzman v. United States. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. Pina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. Keys v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API