Legal Opinion

Haglund v. Van Dorn Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1988No. Docket 95799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. D. Payant, J.

Plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants to answer interrogatories in this products liability action. The circuit court denied plaintiff’s motion. We granted leave to appeal and ordered a stay of trial pending appeal.

On December 12, 1984, plaintiff was seriously injured by the safety arm on an injection molding press. Defendants designed and manufactured the press. Plaintiff brought this action on November 1, 1985. Plaintiff’s action is based on negligence and breach of implied warranties. The negligence alle*526gations include allegations of defendants’ failure to warn.

Plaintiff submitted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Downie v. Kent Products, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. General Electric Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Savage v. Peterson Distributing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Wilson v. W a Foote Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Maerz v. United States Steel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ostoin v. Waterford Township Police DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Yates v. KeaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Haglund v. Van Dorn Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Hindelang v. Werner Co. IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API