Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCue

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1910No. 553PublishedCited by 41 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP NORTH DAKOTA. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a proceeding by the Attorney General of North Dakota, charging the plaintiff in error with continuous violation of a -law fixing rates for the carriage of coal within the State, and asking for an injunction. See Nor. Dak. Laws of 1907, c. 51. The railroad answered that the act was void under Art. I, § 8, of the Constitution, the commerce clause; and also under the Fourteenth Amendment, because the maximum rates fixed by it were inadequate and confiscatory. Evidence was taken and reported to the Supreme Court, and that court decided that the injunction should issue as prayed. 17 Nor.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Simpson v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API