Legal Opinion

Cockerham v. First Nat. Bank of Redmond

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes on to be heard on motion to dismiss the appeal. The suit was instituted for an accounting between plaintiff and defendants on account of a judgment held by defendant bank against plaintiff and which plaintiff claims to have paid. Plaintiff in the suit sought to enjoin defendants from enforcing an execution issued out of the circuit court for Multnomah county on said judgment. Plaintiff appealed from an adverse decree and judgment and gave a stay undertaking on appeal with B. F. Giesy and Frank T. Berry as sureties. Defendants moved to dismiss on three grounds:

“1. Decree and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. C. Bohrnstedt Co. v. ScharenOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hafer v. Medford & C. L. R. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Medynski v. TheissOregon Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RUTH ET UX v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Coos Bay Lumber Co. v. CollierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Liebreich v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Cockerham v. First Nat. Bank of RedmondOregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API