Legal Opinion

Clark v. Deschamps

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1952No. Civ. 14856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This case has had a long and confused history. One phase of it has already been before this court (Deschamps v. Independent Cab Co., 94 Cal.App.2d 127 [210 P.2d 299, 897]-—which see for a supplementary statement of facts). The present appeal is by Clark, doing business as The Independent Cab Company, * from a judgment in a declaratory relief action determining that Clark is not entitled to enjoin Deschamps from enforcing a certain judgment rendered in a prior action against Clark, and that a valid new trial had not been granted in that prior action.

Deschamps was riding as a passenger in a cab…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Morrow v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Nielsen v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lake Merced Golf & Country Club v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. County of Fresno v. Roberson, Martin & Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1954
  3. CTY. OF FRESNO v. Roberson, M. & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.California Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API