Legal Opinion

Rosics v. Heath

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1987No. 87-163PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal and petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging a district court order that modified a Texas child custody order. The order changed physical custody of the parties’ two children from appellant, Robert Andrew Rosies to appellee, Ramona Kay Heath, and required appellant to pay child support and certain future medical bills to be incurred by appellee and the children. The two issues on appeal essentially agreed to by the parties are:

1. Did the Wyoming District Court correctly assume jurisdiction over the parties and their children under the Uniform Child…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minnehoma Financial Co. v. PauliWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Quenzer v. QuenzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nicholaus v. NicholausWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Marquiss v. MarquissWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sarah Ferrell v. Earl KnightenWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Serda v. DennisWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Marquiss v. MarquissWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API