Legal Opinion

Sarah Ferrell v. Earl Knighten

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2013No. S-12-0174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant Sarah Ferrell challenges an order dismissing her professional negligence claim against a real estate agent who represented the sellers in Ferrell’s 2001 purchase of a commercial property. On appeal, Ferrell claims that the agent was negligent in failing to provide a property disclosure statement. We dismiss and explain hereinafter.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] Ferrell presents one issue:

Whether a realtor acting as seller’s agent has a duty of care to the buyer.

FACTS

[¶ 3] On January 31, 2001, Ferrell, along with her sister and brother-in-law, offered to purchase a commercial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McLain v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re SNKWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. McMurry Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wyoming Board of Outfitters & Professional Guides v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rosics v. HeathWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Jerry Herling v. Wyoming Machinery Co., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Worker's Compensation Claim of Little v. State ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Marshall S. Little v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API