Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Botsford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChahplin, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought an action in the court below to recover the balance due for a quantity of coal sold and delivered to the defendant.

The defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that the plaintiffs had entered into a general average bond to pay their proportion of the losses and expenses arising from the raising of the schooner barge H. F. Church, which had sunk in the river near’ the pier at Cleveland, Ohio, having on board a cargo of coal belonging to the plaintiffs in this suit. The court below rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for 1746.67.

There appears in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Peck v. City National Bank of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Chatterton v. ParrottMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Western Manufacturing Co. v. PeabodyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wickes v. PulfreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API