Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. O'Connell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is a suit to set aside a deed from Dennis O’Connell and Clara B. O’Connell to Dennis O’Connell, one of the named grantors. The deed is undated and is not witnessed. The circuit court rendered a decree cancelling the deed, and defendant Allen O’Connell, executor of the estate of Dennis O’Connell, deceased, and Agnes O’Connell, his wife, appeal.

In the summer of 1927 the plaintiff and her then husband, Dennis O’Connell, purchased all of lots 8 and 9 and the east five feet of lot 10, all in block 18, Hanson’s Second Addition to the city of Portland, Multnomah county, Oregon. The north half…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henry v. CarsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Allen v. AyerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Rowe v. FreemanOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Gilmore v. BurchOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Jenkins v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dahlhammer & Roelfs v. SchneiderOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lancaster v. MAY, AS ADMINISTRATOROregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API