Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. MAY, AS ADMINISTRATOR

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1952PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This suit was instituted by the filing of a complaint in the circuit court for Deschutes county, wherein Agnes Pearl Lancaster is named as plaintiff, and Charles Marsch, as defendant. By her complaint plaintiff prayed a decree as follows; to-wit: requiring defendant Charles Marsch to deliver up and surrender to plaintiff a deed of conveyance dated October 6, 1947, wherein plaintiff was grantor and one Lewis M. Lancaster was grantee; or in the event that said deed not be delivered up to plaintiff, that the court order the same to be cancelled and to be declared null and void.

Defendant Marsch…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. State v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jobse v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bogard v. BarhanOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Turner v. CloseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Halleck v. HALLECKOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State of Oregon, by and Through the Division of State Lands v. The Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Putnam v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hilterbrand v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API