Legal Opinion

United States v. Mallard

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Indictment for Perjury. On motion to instruct jury to acquit.

1Opinion of the CourtSimoNton, J.

The indictment is for perjury in taking an affidavit before a commissioner. The case for the prosecution is this: The defendant went before Commissioner Lathrop, and made a verbal statement charging one Benbow with violating section 3242, Rev. St. The commissioner reduced the statement to writing, beginning with the words, “Personallyappeared before me Warren Mallard, who, being duly sworn, deposes,” etc., and ending with the jurat, “Sworn to before me.” He then read the statement over to the defendant, asking if he could write. Upon tho answer of the defendant that he could not write, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BaerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Farrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. State v. TullSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Holy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API