Legal Opinion
Wool v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 13, 1987No. Civ. Y-86-3610PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sanford Wool was formerly employed by the Maryland-National Capital Park and'Planning Commission as its Deputy General Counsel. His position was abolished effective July 1, 1984. Plaintiff has sued the Commission, eleven individuals who served on the Commission, and the County Executives of Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, alleging that the arbitrary and capricious act of abolishing his job violated due process. Defendants' motion to dismiss is ripe for resolution.
1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Scott v. Prince George's County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Potomac Design, Inc. v. Eurocal Trading, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1993
- United States v. WoodsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Rahman El v. NationStar Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020