Legal Opinion · Dissent

LESTENKOF v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 23, 2010No. A-10007Published

1DissentCoats, Chief Judge

Lestenkof was entitled to have his case tried, if possible, on St. Paul Island, the place where his crime allegedly occurred. The record in this case shows that Lestenkof made extensive efforts to have his case tried in Saint Paul. The State made similar efforts to avoid trying the case in Saint Paul. The State ultimately prevailed. The State sue-ceeded in having Lestenkofs trial moved from Saint Paul to Dillingham, where he was convicted. In my view, the State has not met its burden of proving the necessity of depriving Lestenkof of his right to have his case tried in Saint Paul. I would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cano v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  3. Calantas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Linge's Adm'r v. Alaska Treadwell Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1906
  5. Erick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API