Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Consolidation Coal Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Burnett

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case brought by the employee against his employer. The employer is self-insured as far as compensation purposes are concerned and it is conceded by both parties that it was operating *730nnder tlie provisions of the Tennessee Workmen’s Compensation law, T.C.A. sec. 50-901 et seq.

The questions presented by this petition are the application of the statute requiring notice of disability, T.C.A. sec. 50-1107 and the limitation statute, T.C.A. see. 50-1108, when the facts of this particular case come under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. Senators, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Adams v. American Zinc CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wilson v. Van Buren CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Consolidation Coal Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp. v. ReevesTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKinney v. Feldspar Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Willis Bray v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Hellman v. Union Central Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001
  4. Corrington v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
  5. K.K. v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API