Christopher v. Consolidation Coal Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chiee Justice Burnett
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case brought by the employee against his employer. The employer is self-insured as far as compensation purposes are concerned and it is conceded by both parties that it was operating *730nnder tlie provisions of the Tennessee Workmen’s Compensation law, T.C.A. sec. 50-901 et seq.
The questions presented by this petition are the application of the statute requiring notice of disability, T.C.A. sec. 50-1107 and the limitation statute, T.C.A. see. 50-1108, when the facts of this particular case come under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. Senators, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1967
- Adams v. American Zinc CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Wilson v. Van Buren CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp. v. ReevesTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKinney v. Feldspar Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Willis Bray v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Hellman v. Union Central Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2001
- Corrington v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
- K.K. v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.