Peterson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, instituted actions for damages suffered by both parties from injuries inflicted upon the wife by the alleged negligence of defendant. After verdicts for plaintiffs, defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding or for new trials. The motions were denied. Defendant appeals.
About October 3, 1938, defendant installed an electric kitchen stove in plaintiffs’ home. The installation was done pursuant to an agreement which appears to be in the form of an ordinary-conditional sales contract except that it is provided: “Should this range not be satisfactory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Goar v. Village of StephenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Kilgore v. the Shepard CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
3Cited by21 opinions
- Waylander-Peterson Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Thompson v. Burke Engineering Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Renfro v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Holkestad v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.