Legal Opinion
The Garment District, Inc. v. Belk Stores Services, Inc. Mathews-Belk Company Jantzen, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1986No. 85-2362PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
The Garment District, Inc., appeals a judgment of the district court in favor of Belk Stores Services, Inc., Mathews-Belk Co. (collectively Belk), and Jantzen, Inc., entered on a motion for a directed verdict. 617 F.Supp. 944. The Garment District claims that Belk coerced Jantzen into agreeing to terminate sales to the Garment District in furtherance of a price maintenance scheme in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1982). We affirm because the Garment District’s evidence is insufficient to permit the inference that Belk and Jantzen acted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Euromodas, Inc. v. Zanella, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Illinois Corporate Travel, Inc., D/B/A McTravel Travel Services, Plaintiff v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Drs. Steuer & Latham, P.A. v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1987
- Dunnivant v. Bi-State Auto PartsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.