Legal Opinion
McCanna v. McCanna
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 7, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject plaintiffs contention that the judgment of divorce is insufficient as a matter of law because Supreme Court failed to set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its decision in determining property distribution and maintenance. In the judgment of divorce, the court confirmed the report of the Referee, who properly set forth the relevant statutory factors that he considered and the reasons for his decision (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haas v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Verrilli v. VerrilliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Buley v. BuleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Carr v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Giuffre v. GiuffreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mayle v. MayleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Boardman v. BoardmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002