Haas v. Haas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in imputing an annual income of $35,000 to plaintiff for purposes of calculating plaintiffs child support obligation pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act ([CSSA] Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b]). The court “based its calculations on an approximation of [plaintiffs] income and not [plaintiffs] most recent Federal income tax returns” (Linda R. H. v Richard E. H., 205 AD2d…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Baraby v. BarabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Pullman v. PullmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Barber v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Bottitta v. BottittaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Corasanti v. CorasantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Reed v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Hartnett v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Gately v. GatelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Boardman v. BoardmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.