Legal Opinion

Universal Folding Box Co. v. Hoboken City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 25, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

In this appeal, plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 54:3-27.2, as interpreted by the Tax Court, requiring exhaustion of the municipality’s right to appeal prior to compelling the issuance of a property tax refund. We reject plaintiffs challenge and affirm the decision of the Tax Court in Universal Folding Box Co., Inc. v. Hoboken City, 20 N.J.Tax 1 (2002). A brief procedural history of this case is warranted.

Plaintiff filed a tax appeal challenging the assessment on real property it owned in the City of Hoboken for tax…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Matter of FarrellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Falcone v. De FuriaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Universal Folding Box Co. v. Hoboken CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API