Legal Opinion

Matter of Farrell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 24, 1987PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

Death comes to everyone. However, in our society, due to great advances in medical knowledge and technology over the last few decades, death does not come suddenly or completely unexpectedly to most people. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment 15 (1983) (hereinafter President’s Commission Report )1 Instead, most people who die are under the treatment of health care professionals who are able to continue physical existence…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. In Re QuinlanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Vacco v. QuillSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Matter of Baby M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Matter of JobesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API