Legal Opinion
Universal Folding Box Co. v. Hoboken City
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 24, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WEFING, J.A.D.
Defendant City of Hoboken (Hoboken) appeals from five judgments entered in the Tax Court on September 15, 2000 setting the *230assessed value for property owned by Universal Folding Box Co., Inc. (Universal) for the tax years 1994 through 1998.1 The result of the judgments in question is to entitle Universal to a refund of more than $450,000. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied the judgments should be affirmed.
The property is located at Lot 1 of Block 106 in Hoboken and is known as 1200-1318 Madison Avenue. The area is zoned…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Zimmerman v. United Services Auto.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Rodriguez v. LucianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Brae Associates v. Park Ridge BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Albarran v. LukasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fifth Roc Jersey Associates, L.L.C. v. Town of MorristownNew Jersey Tax Court · 2011
- LISA A. KATRAMADOS VS. FIRST TRANSIT, INC. (L-6736-15, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Universal Folding Box Co. v. Hoboken CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003