Legal Opinion

Knowlton v. Spillane

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 25, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-1425-WDPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

(DOCKET ENTRY # 69)

MARIANNE B. BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Plaintiffs’ Motion to File an Amendment to Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Docket entry # 69) was filed on May 30, 1991. The plaintiffs seek to amend their complaint under Mass.Gen.L. ch. 229, §§ 1 and 2 to include claims by the decedent’s three adult children for loss of consortium and for punitive damages relating thereto. (Docket Entry # 69).

DISCUSSION

Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) provides that leave to amend a pleading “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” It is well…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Vargas v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. Norman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. DaSilva v. American Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  5. Mildred M. Peck, Etc. v. Susan GarfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API