Legal Opinion

Norman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 11, 1988PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

The principal question in this case is whether a parent may recover for the loss of a child’s consortium due to injuries negligently inflicted on the child by a third party. *304The complaint alleges that Mathew Norman sustained severe injuries when he was struck by a Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) vehicle, negligently operated by its employee, the defendant, Steven DeDominici. Mathew’s asserted damages include his medical expenses. Meg Manderson Norman, Mathew’s mother, and Paul M. Norman, his father, seek damages for the loss of Mathew’s consortium and they, too, seek damages…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Manning v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. Gallimore v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. St. Germaine v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API